Why do Many Atheists Believe in Aliens, but not God?

Genesis 1:14, 1:16, 1:16–19 — “Lights in the firmament,” “two great lights,” “set in the firmament”

These passages describe the sun, moon, and stars being “placed” in a dome above the earth, which sounds like a fixed Earth with the heavens moving around it.

Geocentrists argue that since the text speaks phenomenologically (“light to rule the day,” etc.), the Bible affirms Earth as the center. And they’re not (entirely) wrong, the writers of the Bible assumed cosmology this way.

The text that describe a “unmoving Earth” come later in psalms , Job and Joshua.

Catholic, following a Thomistic approach wherever possible. Sometimes it’s not, such as with how he (St. Aquinas) defined usury or when babies are ensouled.

Dear dd, I am sincerely moved by the power of your mind. The average “believer” has probably never even read or heard of the texts that you have studied, which are the basis of Catholicism today.

A person of my intellectual caliber could never defeat you in debate, especially since you base your reasoning on your unquestionable faith in the writings of the fathers of the Catholic Church, just I base mine on the authority of the ancient Vedic literatures.
From what you write, it appears that you embrace the concept that the body and soul are one, that the atoms and molecules of the material nature, which are not different from the earth in your front lawn, are capable of consciousness…… that life is produced by a mature combination of molecules, by the inconceivable power of God. In other words, according your conception, there is no difference between spirit and matter, but that spirit is the symptom of matter, when properly fabricated. I cannot embrace this idea, but I do understand that your understanding is not based on the power of mundane logic, but on unshakable faith in the teachings of the founders of the Catholic Church. Therefore it is best to let the matter rest.
Re: the 14 planetary systems, the Vedic literatures do not describe them as planes of existence, but literally as planetary systems, higher and lower. However, at the same time, it is described that the composition of the bodies of the beings on the higher planets are not made of the gross material elements, like the bodies on our earth planet. Their bodies are made of subtle material energy…….similar to the church’s concept of angels. They can travel at the speed of mind, appearing where they wish. They do not have gross material forms.

My thought is, that rather than trying to convince each other, our conversation is an opportunity for me, to learn and understand the cosmology, the axiomatic conceptions of the Catholic Church. Generally, people simply are “members” of one church or another. But you have a scholarly understanding of you faith. I very much appreciate that.

In addressing my question as to why God would place us into the material creation, in total ignorance of our relationship with him, in conditions of the greatest struggle and turmoil, and subject us to the experiences of old age, disease and death…….The Bible does speak of the heavenly host, those souls who live with God in the spiritual realm, where there is no birth, no death, where life is eternal, without beginning and end. But God has placed us here, in a place where we have to surrender our rebellious spirit of independence, and accept that our real identity as spirit souls, is to love the Lord, our God, with all of our heart, mind and strength. I am interested to know if Saint Aquinas has explained for our understanding, why God has chosen to arrange our lives in this way. As I think you are aware, the Vedic conception is, that we, in the material realm, are the fallen angels, who are placed here for our redemption, and that God sends His representatives, like Jeremiah, and Jesus, to guide us back home, as prodigal sons and daughters. I am sure that you are aware of the activities of human beings on earth, from a historical point of view, and from what is going on in this world today. Imperialism is the history of our planet. Exploitation, slavery on all continents, endless wars…..the Vedic literatures explain that this is the activity of the soul that envies the position of God, and cultivates the desire to be the supreme proprietor, the supreme controller, and the supreme enjoyer. In this way, Veda explains, God directs our envy of Him towards each other. Each of us is trying to be God, as much as our individual capacity for power permits. The stronger man, becomes a president, or monarch, or prime minister……and then desires to conquer other nations. The child in the playground wants the other children to play by his rules. The game is the same. The husband wants to exploit the wife. The wife wants to exploit the husband. And when they don’t get what they want from each other, they divorce. But their union is established in the name of love.
I see in your answer that Aquinas postulates that the soul doesn’t exist prior to the creation of the material body. This is a new concept for me. According to Vedic literature, the soul is eteranal, just as God is eternal.”Eternal” means having no beginning and no end. But Aquinas is saying that the soul has a historical starting point. This is new for me.
There is so much evidence of individuals having experience of past lives, of little children describing to their parents where they lived in a past life, the house in another country, the people, their relationships, etc. And when going to investigate these claims of the children, it all seems to prove correct. There are books describing these phenomena.
Also, there are yogis, or even people in everyday life, who experiences what is called, “astral travel”. They can leave their bodies and travel to different places, and then return to their bodies. This is similar to the reports of NDE, “near death experiences”, wherein the consciousness of the person, leaves the body (which may be in a coma) and see Jesus, or past family members, etc., and then return to the body. In other words, there seems to be evidence that the body and spirit are two different things. The body of a dead person will compost, and become earth again. But the soul is eternal.
You make mention of the Council of Florence (1439), rejecting the concept of reincarnation. This means that this discussion has been going on for centuries and is not a new subject. From my point of view, the Council of Florence is made up of men, who are discussing things that are beyond their scope of personal experience. On the other hand, there are people who remember their past lives, and describe the details which can be verified. However, I do respect that you have faith in the philosophy of reality as it is presented by the Catholic Church.
Another point of discussion, it the idea of salvation. The Vedic literatures, in agreement with the teachings of Jesus, as presented in the Bible, do not state that one can achieve salvation by being a good person. There will be sewing and reaping, according to got our actions. This is the “law of karma”, and the reason why one person is born as Prince Harry, and grows up in a palace with servants, and another person is born crippled, paraplegic, or the son of a prostitute. etc. The idea is, as Jesus teaches, “Do unto others as you would have then do unto you.”, because this is the law. Or, as the. man in the street says, “What goes around, comes around.”But Jesus also says, “it is not by good works alone”, that one can enter the kingdom of God. Rather, Jesus explains, one must “love the Lord, thy God with all our heart, and all of our strength.”, which means that every thought, word and deed, must be performed with a loving desire to be pleasing to God. This is the price that Jesus describes. Jesus says that those who are materially successful, because of being “good people” can’t know God, any more than a camel can be pushed through the eye a needle. So, it is not by “good works”, that one can enter the Kingdom of God, according to Jesus, and not according to Vedic teachings. We must become lovers of God, not merely by obedience, but by the spontaneous feelings of love of the heart. And this, is what Jesus came to teach us. The Jews were following the laws of Moses, the 10 commandments, etc. But Jesus came to give the next step……love of God. That is the only next step. simply saying, “I accept Jesus as my savior”……anyone can say like that. But Jesus also describes that at the time of judgement, when the soul says, “I did this in your name, ai did that….”, Jesus will say, “I never knew you.” So what is this “knowing”? Jesus is saying, that he “knows” us, or recognizes us, as much as we “know” him. And what does this mean? it means that we have to accept the yoke that he wares.i And what is that yoke? It is the yoke of love of God. He asks us to accept it. He doesn’t ask us to become church members, or to accept the teachings of Aquinas. He asks us to become lovers of God. Not lovers of family, society, friendship and nation. I have read in Bible that Jesus says he has come to tear the family apart, so that he can claim that one soul, who is ready to truly follow what he wishes to share with him.

It appears that you believe that his material body is going to arise up out of the grave and walk around… I am more inclined to accept the idea or “ashes to ashes, and dust to dust.” The soul is eternal, and this material body is a punishment…….the punishment given to Adam and Eve. We have traded our eternal life for a sojourn in “the valley of the shadow of death”, also known as the material world, where we earn our keep by the sweat of our brow, where we come with nothing, and leave with nothing, where everyone aspires to be “king for a day”, in spite of the fact that Jesus offers us chance to have eternal life.

Thank you, dd, for sharing with me. Although I cannot embrace all of the understandings that you are putting forward, I do find it informative……there is really nothing more important to us than to understand, “Why am I here, Why and I suffering, and what is the purpose of life?” Hare Krishna! (May you be always in communion with God through the mercy of his son, the most glorious Lord Jesus Christ).

Yes, another thought. “Prodigal son” doesn’t simply mean going to a nice place where everything good is supplied to fulfill all our wants. It means…………returning to our real home, where our real Father receives us with open arms. It means we have departed from our real home, and are wandering about, trying to be happy on our own. Jesus has come to take us all back home. This is my understanding. With love and respect, Peter

Thanks, Ddonova7. You are right that those verses imply that the sun and moon circle the earth. I had not thought about that aspect before, only that they describe and antiquated cosmology. However, I don’t see the Bible as teaching science per se anyway, though certainly much of it is factual, but I understand it as teaching what we need to know in our relationship with God.

I took a college-level course in astronomy many years ago and still have the textbook. :slight_smile:

And as everyone knows, Planet Steve is the center of the universe. :wink:

Steve

Sounds like the Bible has some things written in it that are accepted by Catholics, and some things that are not accepted in the light of “scientific” study of nature, etc. If this is the case, then the question arises as to where we draw the line.

For example, no archeologist will find the Garden of Eden on planet earth. Therefore perhaps we should reject the idea that Adam and Eve were “deported” from that earthly Garden, and that because we are born on planet earth as descendants of Adam and Eve, therefore we are born with original sin, being disqualified because of the faults of Adam and Eve.

It makes more sense to conclude that the narrative of Adam and Eve is metaphoric. And, that their eviction was from the spiritual realm, that they were placed in the material world of birth and death because of their rebellious attitude, and that the same thing applies to all of us. And that we are born in ignorance, filled with self-centeredness and oblivious to the supremacy of God, because that was our sinful desire when living in the spiritual realm (otherwise referred to by scripture as the Garden of Eden). And that we struggle down here, in the material world. We struggle and face so trials, disappointments and frustrations. And all of this is arranged by God’s will……for breaking our rebellious spirit. And then God sends His representative to inform us of our constitutional position in relation to God. However, not all souls are are ready to “hear” because they have not yet suffered enough, to be able to accept proper guidance. Therefore Jesus says repeatedly, “Those who have ears, let them hear.”

My thought is that the writing of the Bible, and the interpretations of the Bible given by men who are thoughtful by nature, will only continue to evolve, according to the proclamations of men who are voted into positions of authority by men of lesser caliber.

Please do not misunderstand me. I do believe that God exists. I do believe that He wants our love. I am only saying that the ideas of Catholicism appear to be evolving, at least in part, according to the normative conceptions of the day, and the speculations of unenlightened souls.

“Re: the 14 planetary systems, the Vedic literatures do not describe them as planes of existence, but literally as planetary systems, higher and lower. However, at the same time, it is described that the composition of the bodies of the beings on the higher planets are not made of the gross material elements,”

Then I think I need one more point of clarification – are you saying there are only 14 planetary systems in the whole universe? or just 14 that matter to your cosmological model?

“In other words, there seems to be evidence that the body and spirit are two different things.”

Thomism agrees with this, the soul is created and ensouled in new bodies, but the soul is not the same as matter or the body.

Souls equally are not created through phsycical, material acts (nor were they ever in history). God is involved in its creation, and in the ensoulment.

“You make mention of the Council of Florence (1439), rejecting the concept of reincarnation.”

Oh it’s far older than the council, Florence simply codified the understanding. This really goes back first to St. Augistine, and further to the Greeks and their conception of the metaphysics of human nature.

Ie. its the insights of Plato, Plotinus, and Aristotle, especially the idea that a human person is not a pre-existent spirit inserted into a body, but a single composite being: one substance made of body and rational soul together. This view is grounded in their understanding of form and matter, the soul is the form of the body, the organizing principle that makes a living human be one unified reality.

In this framework, a soul cannot migrate from one body to another, because the identity of a person is bound to the unity of this particular embodied life. When St. Aquinas later develops this further, he doesn’t overturn it, he reinforces it with even clearer arguments. For him, the soul is created by God at the moment the body is ready for it, not because the soul has a “beginning in time” per se, but because a rational soul is always created in relation to this body and this person.

It isn’t a wandering entity trapped in matter; it is the very principle that makes this human being what he or she is.

“It appears that you believe that his material body is going to arise up out of the grave and walk around”

To be clear, it’s not your normal body, rather it is one that is glorified, spiritualized, imperishable, and different in quality (1 Cor 15:42–44).
Christ is himself the model; physical, but transformed as we see of him post the Resurrection.

Now onto your question:

“Why does God create souls who have no pre-existence and place them in the material world?”

Well, from the Catholic and Thomistic perspective, the reason God creates us without pre-existence is because existence itself is a pure gift.

God freely and lovingly creates each human soul at the moment of conception (CCC 366), not as a demotion from a previous life but as the beginning of an entirely new, unrepeatable person. Creation is participation in being. As Aquinas puts it, God wills the good of creatures by giving them existence (ST I.19.2)

We are created because God is generous, and freely gives of himself.

So if God’s creation is good, why do we find ourselves in a world with suffering, ignorance, and moral struggle? Here Aquinas argues that God orders the universe toward a higher good that includes the drama of freedom, growth, and virtue. Humans are created with real free will, and real freedom entails the capacity for disorder, sin, and moral darkness (ST I-II.79).
Yet this is not because God wishes ignorance upon us. Rather, he permits the possibility of moral failure so that higher goods—courage, mercy, redemption, hope, and self-giving love (called “agape”)— can exist.

These goods cannot exist in a static paradise. They arise precisely from our embodied, historical lives where we can freely learn to love the Good Himself.

The Baltimore Catechism, from which I was taught when I was young, stated succinctly that we are creatures composed of body and soul and made in the image and likeness of God and that He made us to know, love, and serve Him in this world and to be happy forever with Him in heaven.

Hi Literalman (my dear friend, if I may),

As you may know that I have not been exposed to the Catholic Catechism, being born into a family of hard-core Jewish atheists…….

I now have read of two concepts or modules in the life of a Catholic. On the one hand, I believe that I have read (on this site), that at some point, (I think it is when Jesus returns to our planet), all of his deserving disciples/followers/worshippers will arise from their graves with eternal bodies. And on the other hand, I am reading, at present, “that He made us to know, love, and serve Him in this world and to be happy forever with Him in heaven.”

I am attracted to this second description (above). And it brings questions to mind also. What is our life like in heaven? Do we know Him, and love Him, and serve Him in heaven, as we do on earth? Does the soul have an eternal spiritual form when he/she goes to heaven? what are the activities of the soul in the spiritual realm (heaven)? Is the relationship with God in heaven more personal than only knowing Him with faith, but not being able to bow before Him, or to be embraced in His arms? (I would like to make a flower garland, and in all humility have the opportunity to place it on the shoulders of God, and then bow down before Him.)

And last, but not least, how do we reconcile these two seemingly divergent rewards, being reborn from the grave on earth, vs. the blessing of eternal life with God in heaven? What is the predominant understanding according to Catholic Catechism?

Thank you my friend. Your gentleness gives me courage to make these inquiries. Peter

Greetings dd!

I have an appointment in a half hour, but I am very enthused to continue our conversation. Your explanations and elaborations are on the Phd level, as well as saturated with patience and kindness. Thank you so much.

According the Vedic astrological descriptions of the universe, there are 14 planetary systems, each with its “collection” of planets. These planets are higher and lower. According to our activities, of piety and impiety, we take birth on these various planets. According to the concept of reincarnation (which I understand is rejected by Catholicism) we are subjected to the process of “sewing and reaping”, or “karma”, and we take our birth, according to our merit, birth after birth. According to these scriptures, the only way to leave the material creation, and all 14 planetary systems behind us and go to God’s domain where all residing souls have eternal life, is by the process of cultivation and attainment of spontaneous heartfelt feelings of ecstatic love of God, which in turn causes the soul to be indifferent to the pleasures and pains of the material world.

I am very pleased and excited to read your words that describe that the body and soul, according to Catholic Catechism, are two different entities, different qualities. According to to our Vedic literatures, the soul is eternal, the soul is conscious……while the material body is temporal, dead matter (“ashes to ashes, dust to dust”). But as long as the eternal conscious spirit soul is “housed” within the material form, the consciousness of the spirit pervades the mind and material senses, thereby causing the soul to feel, “I am this body”. In this way, the soul tries to satisfy himself by trying to satisfy the material sense………which can never be satisfied (except for a few moments). The idea put forward by Veda is that the satisfaction of the soul can only be attained in the reciprocation of love with God. Therefore we see, even in the lives of the Catholic saints, that those who are closer to God become progressively indifferent to the demands of the material senses, and the concept that I am a man or a woman, which applies to the material form. Therefore the saints are devoid of sexual impulse, but see all people on earth as pure spiritual entities.

I do understand from your words, that the discussion, or debate ,in relation to the concept of reincarnation goes far back in history, and has been around for a long time. At what point in time does the body of the fetus receive the soul, and become conscious, according to your faith?

Another question that arises…….according Catholicism, does the deserving soul go to heaven, or is he risen from the grave?

I like your answer: “existence itself is a pure gift.” But to experience existence in this way…..this requires a very high attainment of spiritual “realization”, known by very few……the ones that we call the saints.

I have an appointment now. But will return to our conversation later today. Thank you so much for conversing with me. Peter

“Hi Literalman (my dear friend, if I may),” I am honored. I don’t use Facebook, so I don’t have any Facebook friends. All my friends are real (I’m not saying that no Facebook friends are real, but Facebook seems to use the word “friend” loosely. :slight_smile: One coworker joked that becoming my friend (she was one; I was at her wedding) is not easy: it requires forms and application fees.

It’s been more than 60 years since I studied the Baltimore Catechism. I don’t remember much besides the words I quoted. However, I found a copy online at The Baltimore Catechism. In the part about the resurrection and life everlasting, I don’t see anything about what life in heaven will be like.

I think that the Baltimore Catechism has been superseded by the Catechism of the Catholic Church, which is online at Catechism of the Catholic Church | Catholic Culture . There may be something about life in heaven in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, but with a short look I didn’t find it.

So here is my understanding of Catholic teaching on life after death as it regards heaven:

God created us as incarnate spirits: spirits with bodies.

After death, those in heaven are happy, that is not their ultimate destiny. After the resurrection, they will once again be incarnate spirits living in a new, perfect physical world.

After death, we will see God as He is (1 John 3:2). OK, but what is that like? “As they enter the vision of God, they become like Him,” wrote Father Richard Simon under the playful pen name “Reverend Know-It-All.” In another place, he wrote, “We sit around staring at God … It all sounds very boring.… What the Bible really says is that you can’t even begin to imagine how wonderful heaven will be, but you can begin to experience it a little if you get to know Christ.… He wants us to move in with Him. We are His children, and he want us to move back home! We have a room at Dad’s house, and when we grow up we will be just like Him. He will be part of us and we will be part of Him, just as Jesus already is. At least that’s what St. John seemed to think.… The beatific vision, staring at God for an eternity, is not quite as boring as it might first appear. Have you ever fallen in love?” A man looking at his bride, a mother looking at her baby asleep—”There is nothing as beautiful, as wonderful as the simple joy of seeing someone you love. Heaven is to behold the beloved perfectly and forever. If you have ever fallen in love, you’ve experienced a pale shadow of the wonder of heaven. To be perfectly in love forever with someone who is really worthy of all our devotion. That is worship. That is heaven.”

That’s kind of abstract, but I don’t think I can get closer to the truth than Father Simon did.

After the resurrection, I expect that we will live in a physical world that is just as God intended before sin entered the world.

HI DD! Back to continue our discussion.
What you explain about souls rising out of their graves is very amazing. You say that the body they arise out of the graves with is “not your normal body”, but it’s “spiritualized, imperishable, and different in quality.” Are there any words in scripture that indicate when this will come about? And what is the destiny of those who died before the appearance of Jesus on our planet?

Regarding the question of why God creates us and places us in a world that is filled with indescribable trials and pains, you are explaining that God does this out of love for us. Considering the understanding that the heavenly host lives with God in the spiritual realm, where these anomalies don’t exsit, this is still conceptually unsatisfying to me and to my heart. But I am willing to hear more. I am still convinced, that like the metaphor of Satan himself, who is a fallen angel, and considering that we no longer live in the Garden of Eden……that we are fallen angels, given an opportunity to live outside of the “Garden of Eden” where we struggle to live by the sweat of our brow…….but as “prodigal sons”, are given an opportunity to repent and be redeemed.
Another point that resists acceptance in my heart is your statement that “God wills the good of creatures by giving them existence.” I agree wholeheartedly with this concept…..and that’s why I do not eat animals, fowl, and fish. (I know that in some cultures people eat reptiles. I have seen video of people in Asian markets, skinning large snakes while they alive, and putting the wreathing serpents into baskets for the buyer to take home for cooking). It is my unshakable conviction that an animal is more than a machine made of material energy. The creatures have consciousness. Many of the species can respond to human love, and reciprocate. A cow or a pig, or a lamb cannot be created in a laboratory. They do not have the “software” (conceptual capacity) of the human mind. They cannot understand the concepts that religion offers us. But they are more than a combination of earth elements and water. They are spirits, just as we are spirits. But they do not possess the intellectual capacities that a human body provides. And yet people consider them like fruits and vegetables, to be harvested, and slaughtered. The scriptures that I am drawn to state that as long as this needless slaughtering of innocent creatures continues, nature’s backlash will come upon us in the form of wars, earthquakes, volcanoes, draughts and floods, plagues like covid, etc. But people say, “Bad luck.” Nothing happens by chance. It is all the will of God.
You write that, “We are created because God is generous, and freely gives of himself.”, I like that. My scriptures go a step further. They say that God created us because He enjoys to be loved. He enjoys our love. He needs nothing. He is complete within Himself. But he enjoys our love. And therefore we have been created……. for this purpose alone. To love God is the purpose of our existence. Jesus says the very same thing. You may wonder that I say such a thing. But I ask you to consider. The Jewish clergy have their law books, their commandments. They have books that give the rules of social conduct. Jesus says that all those laws are good, and the he didn’t come to change any of them. They accused Jesus of “working on the Sabbath” when he healed people. They accused him of picking grains when passing though the fields on the Sabbath. The Jews were, and still are very rule-conscious. It is the religion of being “good boys and girls”, and being rewarded by going to heaven. Jesus says that he did not come to change the law, but that “man doesn’t to enter the Kingdom by good works alone”. Jesus came to complete the law, to give the highest understanding of the law, the next step for the Judaic people. And he revealed that next step when the Jewish clergy asked Jesus what is the most important rule. What is the highest rule. They were thinking, that perhaps they could make Jesus say something that they could hold against him, so that they could discredit him. But Jesus gave them the highest rule. He said that the rule of all rules is to “love the Lord thy God with all of your mind, all of your heart, and all of your strength.” My logic is…..that if love of God, without asking for anything in return, is the highest rule…….and……if we accept that Jesus only tells us what God wants of us…….then this is what God wants of us more than anything else. And therefore, my mind and heart tell me……we are created only for this purpose. And, that everything else that we feel we need in life will automatically be provided, if, and when, we become obedient to this instruction of Jesus. “Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven.” “Oh ye of little faith……”. But we are not ready, yet, to “Consider the lilies of the field. They work not….and yet God provides all that they need.” (paraphrase). We don’t accept these teachings. We don’t live as Jesus instructs. Because we simply don’t have enough faith yet. But at least, let us begin to understand what Jesus is teaching, to have a sense of direction, and to begin to pray for the ability to live, incrementally, by degree, according to his instruction, as Jesus himself lived among, to show by way of example, what a real spiritual life looks like. The fishermen who worked to maintain their families, were hesitant to give up their work, and Jesus said, “Let it all go and become fishers of men.”, meaning saving the souls of men. This is my understanding of a Catholic life. Amen. Thank you for our discussion, Peter

Right, but Im asking, is this stating that there are just 14 planetary systems in existence? Or does it acknowledge there are more?

At what point in time does the body of the fetus receive the soul, and become conscious, according to your faith?

Another question that arises…….according Catholicism, does the deserving soul go to heaven, or is he risen from the grave?

The notion “when” the soul is infused has varied a bit throughout the centuries, Aquinas theorized it was during the “quickening”. The current consensus is that it’s at conception, when the zygote comes into existence as a new human organism.

Souls when people die go to Heaven, hell, or purgatory(then to Heaven after a period of penance). The heavenly souls are to be later reunited with their sanctified bodies, stated to happen after the Second Coming of Jesus, during the Last Judgment. I cannot be more specific than that, even the Bible states we know neither the date nor the hour.

And what is the destiny of those who died before the appearance of Jesus on our planet?

As we state in the Apostle’s creed, when Christ died, he descended to the dead and released the righteous, opening heaven for them.

“Many of the species can respond to human love, and reciprocate. A cow or a pig, or a lamb cannot be created in a laboratory. They do not have the “software” (conceptual capacity) of the human mind. They cannot understand the concepts that religion offers us. But they are more than a combination of earth elements and water”

The Greeks agreed with this notion, they don’t see animals as having a “rational soul”, but they do have spirtual substance above that of other forms of matter.

But Jesus gave them the highest rule.

Jesus did not really give the rule, so much as restated it. What he’s mentioning there is a passage from Deuteronomy 6 that Jews call the Shema, it’s a core Jewish prayer.

Equally the Jews, while they are more rule-bound as a culture and covenant, didn’t simply reduce their faith to that.

Ancient Judaism already taught the availabilty and importance of God’s mercy, that the Covenant was a gift not simply a loveless obligation, and as I said, saw the loving of God as the highest commandment.

As to reducing faith to love, Catholicism does not do this either. Instead, it’s more like Grace + virtue + sacramental life + reason + moral action + charity. They’re all held in equal regard.

Grace, love, completes life, perfects it even, but the other things still matter.

Equally, while we did do away with most Jewish cermonial laws, we do still have commandments. We have rules.

“If you love me, keep my commandments.” (John 14:15)

Such wonderful scholarly responses! I have great respect for your studies and assimilation. It is a genuine pleasure to hear your answers and assertions.
Regarding the 14 planetary systems, yes, only 14, but of course within each system (for lack of better words) there may be innumerable planets. According to Vedic literature, the bodies of souls on different planets are composed of the energies of the planet. For example, a fish requires an aqueous environment and cannot live on land. A man cannot live his life submerged in water. Therefore to live on a given planet one must have a specific kind of body. Again, for example, the Vedic literature describes that there are beings on the sun planet. But you and I cannot live on the sun planet, because we do not have bodies that can live on the sun planet. Those who live on the sun planet requires bodies composed of fire. I understand that this is an unusual concept. But I also know that Jesus says that there are many more things that he could describe to his disciples, but they were not ready to hear of such things. Again for example, what is the sociology of the spiritual world? Jesus says, in Bible, if I remember correctly that he does not make the seating arrangements in heaven, who sits where, when asked, I think by one of his disciples. Veda states that God has a personal form, and does wear a crown, and does sit on a throne. And why not? Only the mundane mind will be puzzled and say: If God has a personal form ion heaven, how can He simultaneously be omnipresent in all of our hearts? But why not? If he can expand Himself as the Father, the son and the all pervasive Holy Ghost, why can He not have a personal form?

Re how many planetary systems exist within the universe……..not only are there 14 planetary systems within the universe, but there are, according to Vedic literature, unlimited universes. Unlimited. And according Vedic literature, the universes emanate from the breathing of God. When He exhales, the universes come out from him just like the dust particles that we see in a sunbeam of light. Millions. And when He inhales, all of them are reabsorbed into His being, and all the souls in those universes are contained within His spiritual body, in a dormant condition, until He breathes out again. And this is only the material creation. Then the Vedic literature describes the spiritual realm, where everything and everyone exists eternally. And that the material creation, with its unlimited material universes, is a small part of the kingdom of God. And God’s presence, as the all-pervading Holy Ghost, is omnipresent. But the realization of His omnipresence is only given to those souls in the material world who are engaged in sincere worship. Just like one who is sincere, can feel the presence of Jesus within his heart 24/7. He “never walks alone.” In the same way, Jesus, from within the heart of the purely devoted soul, can introduce the individual soul to God the Father. That is his mission. But first one must learn from intimate association with Jesus, what is love of God. Only from the son can one learn love of the Father. This is the purport of Jesus saying that one can only know the Father through the son. But to do this one must first be in intimate association with Jesus within his heart. “Accept the yoke that I wear.” This is the yoke of love of the Father. Jesus offers that yoke to us. One can only acquire that from one who has it. Or from one who has acquired it from Jesus. And that is the real position of the real pope. That is the real qualification of the real pope. Then by worshipping him, one can receive the yoke that Jesus wears, because the real pope also wears that yoke. If one says that this is unreasonable, then why has Jesus said, “Accept the yoke that I wear.”?

I mix my thoughts with my questions. I get carried away. There is nothing more exciting in life that to discuss and contemplate the subject of spiritual life, the goal of life, and how to proceed towards that goal. Surely there is more to it than to be a church member, and have some water poured over one’s head. Yes, that can be a beginning. Even in this world, there is a ceremony for a man and wife to get married. But that’s only the beginning. They have to live as man and wife. We have to live in communion with Jesus, and when he is satisfied, when he is pleased……everything will be revealed. ”Knock and the door will be opened to you.” But that knocking has to be there.

Regarding the 14 planetary systems, yes, only 14, but of course within each system (for lack of better words) there may be innumerable planets.

Are you positive that only 14 planetary systems exist is what they meant? I ask, as there have been two exo-planet searching missions lead by NASA, first Kepler from 2009 to 2018, then TESS starting in 2020.

The Kepler Satellite found over 2,700 planets in its lifetime, around 500 of which were Earth sized. While many of these were found within the same solar system, the number of planetary systems it discovered was far more than just 13. It’s easily over a 1,000.

TESS, which is far newer, has found an additional ~600 exoplanets, possibly as many as 7,000 to still be confirmed. That’s easily another 2-3,000.

And this is all within just our own Milkyway Galaxy. With other systems, we’ve seen planets in other galaxies as well. And even “Rogue planets” which were cast off from their home galaxies, into the void.

I work in aerospace, and while I didn’t work directly on these missions, I’ve seen some of this data personally. There isn’t any doubt as to what they’ve found.

These subjects are not really important. We are talking about what happens when we die, why we are here in the material world, what is the process by which we can attain eternal life in association with God………and these “scientists” are contributing nothing of value in this context. Merely spending tax dollars on something that does nothing for the people in general. All the scientific research on the planet cannot help anyone to go to heaven. It’s another distraction, and waste of time. this is my conviction. A real scientist will say, “God is so inconceivably great. He floats all these planets in space. He makes the sun rise every day, and the moon at night. He causes fruits and flowers to appear out of the earth. He sends His son to our planet to tell about things we would never dream about otherwise. Let us all bow down before Him in a sincere mood of awe and veneration.” Our business is not to “conquer nature”. This will never happen. All the so-called scientific progress in the past 100 odd years, has made the oceans toxic, made the air polluted, contaminated the water supply, and made our lives more and more complex in the name of convenience. Our business is to understand what God wants of us, and and live our lives in effort to invoke His pleasure.

Oh I must disagree, they are extremely important.

I do agree the final question you wish to discuss, what happens when we die, why we exist, and how we return to God, they are absolutely the most important questions in life.

But from a Catholic and Thomistic perspective, the dismissal of science as irrelevant or harmful is simply a misunderstanding of what science is for.

For Thomas Aquinas, all truth is God’s truth, and the study of the natural world is not a distraction from God but a way of encountering His wisdom. As Aquinas quotes Wisdom 13:5: “From the greatness and beauty of created things comes a corresponding perception of their Creator.” Scientific discovery does not pull us away from God — it reveals His handiwork more clearly. To learn that there are thousands of planetary systems does not diminish God; it magnifies Him, because creation is larger and more wondrous than ancient people could possibly have imagined.

You said that science “cannot help anyone go to heaven.” In one sense that is true, salvation is by God’s grace, not by physics. But at the same time, science is a part of the human vocation. Genesis commands us to “till and keep” creation, to study it, understand it, and use that knowledge to heal, build, and steward. Thomistic theology holds that human reason is a divine gift; using it properly is an act of worship, not rebellion. It is not science that pollutes; it is rather human vices that misues reason for greed, pride, and injustice, the very things Christ came to heal.

So while you are right that eternal life matters more than astronomy, i find it to be a mistake to say scientific knowledge has “no value,” or that a scientist’s work cannot glorify God. As St. John Paul II, drawing on Aquinas, said: “Faith and reason are like two wings by which the human spirit rises to the contemplation of truth.” Science is one of those wings. Faith is the other. Neither contradicts the other when properly ordered.

Hi dd!

Science has its place in our lives (whether we like it or not.). What I actually meant to convey is the fact that with every step forward in scientific “progress”, there are so many anomalies that come along with it. E.g., pollution of rivers and aquifers, and:

“The ozone layer, located in the stratosphere, is damaged by human-created chemicals, leading to an increase in harmful UV rays reaching the Earth’s surface. This damage allows more of the sun’s ultraviolet (UV) radiation to penetrate the atmosphere, which can cause sunburn, increase the risk of skin cancer, and harm other life on Earth”.

Similarly, “AI Overview: Holding a cell phone to your head while using it can increase exposure to radio frequency (RF) energy, which may cause side effects like headaches, nausea, and sleep disturbances due to both the radio and the blue light. (they are now trying to determine whether it causes cancer, which means they will be killing thousands of innocent creatures to make their experiments.)

As you are probably aware, there are many books describing the problems the human race has created for themselves, for the environment, for the wildlife (extinction of some species) all so that we can enjoy the benefits of scientific progress. (forgive my sarcasm).

In other words (and I ask you to contemplate what I am suggesting) consider comparing the motivation for making scientific progress to the building of the Tower of Babel. Rather than being content to accept life as God has provided, the land, the soil, the sun and moon, the natural crops, the butter, milk, the cloth made from natural yarn (now we wear plastic clothing), we have scientific progress, with people in they third word living in factories so that we can enjoy their lives of virtual slavery. (Was science required for renovation of the Garden of Eden?) I”ll try to be more succinct…..but I think you understand my perspective.

So our “scientific progress” is like building the Babel Tower, by trying to make our quality of life bigger, better, and “more”. And my impression is that God is not at all pleased. And all of the anomalies on earth, that are the result, is God’s feedback. I foresee that a time will come when the youth will begin to return to the land.
Another aspect of the “scientific” community is the philosophy of empericism. “the theory that all knowledge is derived from sense-experience. Stimulated by the rise of experimental science, it developed in the 17th and 18th centuries, expounded in particular by John Locke, George Berkeley, and David Hume.”

“Empiricism, which holds that knowledge comes from sense experience, is often in antagonism with religious spiritual concepts because many religious beliefs rely on a supernatural realm inaccessible to the senses. This creates a fundamental conflict, as empiricism requires evidence from observation, while many spiritual concepts are based on faith, revelation, or mystical experience.”

In other words, much the scientific community, and its influence in education, the schools and universities, serves to discourage the spiritual orientation of youth today. When I took science courses in universities, my professors taught us that religious thinking is a “primitive” approach to life. “Now we are enlightened. The good quality of life that we are desiring will come from science.” This is demonic. Therefore the peoples of the earth are in greater suffering as a consequence. Our tax dollars are spent on the production of nuclear bombs. Nuclear reactors that sometimes explode. We have Hiroshima and Nagasaki to remind of the progress of science.

Real science is the science of how to make spiritual progress, how to actually come closer to God, which very few understand. Instead they are encouraged to think that by having water poured over their head one time, and returning to lives of total materialism of TV and video games, football games, boxing matches, and martial arts tournaments (which is not much different from the fighting of Roman colosseum gladiators) that they have been saved. This is the standard of contemporary religious observance.

So much of what you say I accept without argument. A printing press can be used to print the Bible. The TV can be used to broadcast a sermon. And so on. But we should not be encouraged to look to science for our salvation, for eternal life. That is a post-dated check that we will never be able to cash. Ans you say, “Neither contradicts the other when properly ordered.” I am only pointing out some of the dangers. The desire for profit tends to overcome the desire for pleasing God, serving God, coming closer to God, and bringing the world closer to God. The governments are run by the wealthy, who use to governments for facilitating their materialistic aspirations to increase their financial fortunes. In this sense democracy is a hoax.
I have to get ready for a trip to town, to do errands. I will come back to continue our discussion. I sincerely hope I am not offending anyone.

Thank you for speaking with me, Peter

Hi Peter, thank you for explaining your perspective so clearly. I wanted to respond to a few things you brought up, not to argue with you, but to offer another way of looking at the same concerns.

It’s understandable to feel uneasy about the downsides of technology. Pollution, nuclear weapons, consumerism, and the exploitation of the poor are real moral failures. Where we differ is on the cause. You see scientific progress itself as the root problem, as being the manifestion of Babel, whereas many philosophical and spiritual traditions, including Catholicism, make a distinction between tools and how humans choose to use them.

Creating tools, cultivating the earth, building, inventing, and improving life are ways we imitate the Creator, some we can do righteously because we are made in His image. In that view, the goal isn’t to abandon the modern world, but to infuse it with virtue. To use creativity, reason, science, and technology in ways that serve human dignity rather than undermine it.

In truth, the issue isn’t science, but disordered desire, pride, greed, and poor stewardship. The same scientific understanding that allows industrial pollution also allows clean water treatment, medicine, agriculture, and environmental restoration. The same physics that makes nuclear weapons possible also makes MRI machines, solar panels, and weather prediction possible.

And Even cases where we did create a weapon, they can still be a force for mercy.

The nuclear powered carriers we built to fight the Soviets, ended up serving as off-shore generators and hospitals to the people of Haiti after the 2010 Earthquake. Weapons preserving life, where nature itself sought to end it.

In other words: the moral weight remains on human choices, not on the tools.

You also mentioned empiricism turning people away from the spiritual. That can certainly happen, but the Catholic Church, for our part, sees empiricism as simply one method of knowing the physical world, not a worldview that has to replace spiritual meaning. One can value evidence for material questions and still hold that meaning, purpose, and the transcendent belong to a different category of truth.

Your concern about shallow or materialistic versions of religion is something many people agree with. But again, others would place the blame on moral formation, culture, and human will; not on science as such. A society can become spiritually shallow with or without advanced technology; the remedy I would argue is deeper conversion, deeper meaning, and deeper love.

Where we do agree, I think, is that humans often lose their way chasing comfort or power. The question is how to respond: by rejecting scientific development entirely, or by redirecting it towards serving human dignity and the common good.

I hope this comes across in the spirit intended, not to dismiss your concerns, but to add another philosophical angle to them. I appreciate the conversation and your openness.

Yes, dd, I agree with you 100%. Opulence of any kind, be it power, wealth, knowledge, beauty, or fame……..is not a bad thing in itself. It’s all a question of how we use it.

This brings us to the distinction between “God and mammon”. The difference between the two is whether we engage in life with a self-centered orientation…….how to make our lives more fulfilling, more complete , more satisfying, more pleasurable, directly through the agency of our mind and senses………or whether we our every thought, word and deed is consciously and purposefully intended to give pleasure to the Lord.
In the material realm, the material world, man is inclined to lack a sense of living connection with God, to not know Him, to not feel His presence in our lives, to not have spontaneous feelings of love for Him, or to feel His love for us. This mood of separateness induces the spirit soul to seek happiness through the satiation of his mind and senses. The mind wants to enjoy a superior social position, and the senses want tastes, smells, touches, sounds, sights, and sexual stimulation that are pleasing.

We cannot stop having desires. The ascetics make this attempt. But desire is a quality of the spirit itself. In the Vedic literature the individual spirit souls are compared with the leaves on a great tree. All the leaves require water. If the leaves try to water themselves, this will not quench their thirst. Some few of the leaves may try to water the other leaves. But this also will not satisfy completely. But if one of the leaves waters the root of the tree, all the leaves, flowers, fruits and branches are satisfied, without separate endeavor. Therefore, as you say, we have to “ make a distinction between tools and how humans choose to use them.”

If society in general is going to make this distinction, education is the first essential. We have to become convinced that our desires to satisfy ourselves through our minds and sense alone, is a dysfunctional approach to life. If we reflect upon the historical accounts of the lives of the saints, we immediately see the difference. Because they are “watering the root” of our existence, they are proportionately released from humanity’s obsessive drive towards the illusory pursuit of sense gratification. E.g.,my social security retirement amounts to some $12,000 a year, and I believe that persons like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos are trillionaires. But they cannot eat more for breakfast than I can. I need six feet of floor space for taking rest at night. I need some clothing, and a roof over my head. More money, a larger house, more expensive clothing, driving a Rolls Royce, etc., these things do not make us more satisfied. In fact we see that the millionaire, billionaire, and trillionaire still feels he wants more, and feels that having more will make him happy. That’s when exploitation and imperialism become rampant across the globe. In other words, it is faith in the worship of mammon that is the enemy of the world. The worship of mammon means that the individual aspires to lord it over his personal sphere of influence, as far as possible, be it large or small.
Therefore, it is not that scientific “progress” is in itself a source of evil…….but our faith in science as the source of fulfillment of our lives………this is a post-dated check that diverts the hearts of men from the real goal of life. Why does Saint Francis leave his well-to-do family life and live his life as an ascetic? Austerity is not his goal. God is his goal. And more clothes, more shoes, more cars, more bank balance, more videos, more sports events, more, more, more, more…….these are simply distractions, impediments, that consume our energies, to the extent that if a man manages to spend an hour going to church once a week, that is an accomplishment. So…..it’s not the scientific innovations that are directly the problem, but the faith of the man in the street, that these innovations will make his life complete. In fact, this faith is delusion. If you ask Francis if he cares for any of it, he will laugh. This faith is the difference between the worship of God and and the worship of mammon. Jesus talked about this in his sermon on the mount. One becomes the servant of one or the other. “A man cannot have two masters.”
So, yes, as you say, we can use technology “in ways that serve human dignity rather than undermine it.”

Again, as you say, empiricism has its place in our lives. A man knows by experience that his environment cannot be too cold or too hot. That is empiricism. But no degree of empiricism will enable us to know God, because God only reveals Himself to us in response to our degree of faith and devotion.

Why did Jesus say that we should “consider the lillies of the field.”? He said that they don’t work hard and yet God supplies their needs, making them so beautiful. But if we have the faith that scientific discoveries, inventions, appliances, technologies, will make our lives complete………then a man will work 40, 60, 80 hours a week to obtain these things which cannot fulfill his heart. But we are encouraged from the time we enter school, to the time we graduate from universities that more money can buy more things, and therefore…….let us work very hard. This is not the fault of technology, which is simply the application of nature’s laws. But it is the fault of education, or mis-education that purposely misleads the mass of mankind to have “more”, thereby placing us all in competition, and turning the world upside down. Still do I agree with you when you write, “A society can become spiritually shallow with or without advanced technology; the remedy I would argue is deeper conversion, deeper meaning, and deeper love.”

As you say, “Where we do agree, I think, is that humans often lose their way chasing comfort or power. The question is how to respond: by rejecting scientific development entirely, or by redirecting it towards serving human dignity and the common good.”

One point of consideration is that people in general are followers. They follow the leaders. And whatever standards the leaders demonstrates, the people follow. This is a sociological fact. Good leadership is of the utmost importance. Nelson Mandella, Martin Luther King, Abraham Lincoln………what to speak of Jesus himself…….the minds and hearts of men can be guided if those with leadership abilities set good examples.
Part of the problem is the way in which societies are established. If the corporations, the business-minded sector “own’ the governments, either through lobbying or by directly holding government seats, this immediately creates a conflict of interest. Such a government cannot serve the needs of the people. It will not control pollution created by industry. It will facilitate industry, because it becomes the servant of industry. This is only one example. There are so many. It will not tell people that eating animal flesh is carcinogenic and that feeding kids sugar will produce an epidemic of diabetes among the youth of the country……..because the government is invested in catering to the financial aspirations of these corporations. Etc., etc.

Therefore the division of church and state is an anomaly. Yes, there should be freedom of religion, and no single religion should enforce its way of worship on the citizens. But government must be guided by real spiritual leadership, for the good of the people. Government is administrative, a ruling arm. But that ruling has to be such that the society in general is moving towards communion God. Otherwise it is animal society. Eating, sleeping, defending and mating in sophisticated ways, without moving closer to God is simply a high class animal society.

I think that Catholicism hods the position that we are all born under the influence of “original sin”. Therefore, without spiritual guidance in every sector of society, we find ourselves moving the wrong direction. There is the hymn, “We Shall Overcome”. Society is faced with the challenge of overcoming the tendency to create more sin because of the influence of original sin. It is an uphill battle. Separation of church and state……this is a step in the wrong direction.

So many interesting topics……
I enjoy conversing with you. Thank you for responding to me in such a nice way. Peter