I think Self Stimulation encouragement, is a Federalist ploy to add blackmail to people

General
1

One modern example is Jeffrey Epstein. Now i know, some might say Catholic Chuch also has these scandals and issues? And they dont believe in that at all.

I guess what i view it as, is the sickness of the mind. And that there is a Communist plot, by either 20th century Eugenicists like Woodrow Wilson, Bleuler or Hans Asperger. The idea to control people collectively within Strong Central Government. The wanted race of people within Race Communist mindset.

So that people won’t rely on Lord for judgement. But become subservient to the way the state wants it. Because thats what Communism leads to. its Opportunism for a Strong Central Government.

And once its established? It will also add to the false safety, that eventually will be used by malicious people, using it for blackmail. People who want something out of you for personal gains.

Overall i am for Seperation of Communism and State. Aswell as Seperation of Religion and State. Letting Government be neutral. And Christianity existing as the body of the majority of followers. Interms of doing their job fairly

Or do you think i am crazy? Let me know what you think?

2

Peace to all,

So true, DonaldD, I believe, too.

We become from dust, through the flesh reborn from the spirit saved in the Image of the Father Transfigured again in One Family.

“Whose face is on the coin?” Jesus, 32 A. D.

Logically Man renders to God and Caesar and Caesar does the same.
What God are the Caesars of today Rendering too?
And we are not to judge, as rational and faithful people, rationally and faithfully, I believe.

The Question becomes, What Wiil is the Fathers will? What will we become again as One Family?

Peace always.
Stephen

1 Like
3

Yes. That was a whole load of nonsense

1 Like
4

Well i tried…

--

5

You should brush up on what communism actually is

6

Communism = Strong Central Government. They will use optics on classless society. But most communist leaders were from wealthy families. Outside maybe Stalin who usurped it.

But Communists dont like traditions, language, culture or religion. Anything that stands in their power grab of what their ideal society looks like. So Communists are culturally Opportunists and the real racists.

7

That’s way off base. Communism ultimately entails the abolition of the state.

I don’t think I can discuss this with you any further if you’re not going to work with real information

8

Including everything of value within that culture. Communists generally speaking is Opportunistic and self indulgent.

But Communists are really Race Communists. They dont love poor people. They hate them. They want to mold society into what they approve of. Thats why Progressives today who are liberals. Are branches of the eugenicist idea from Woodrow Wilson era

9

Peace to all,

So true, when the Caesar Powers becomes united undefiled and unfailing from the Mind of God, then we have Transformed Dynamic World Order becoming again Hypo-Statically and Dynamically Transfigured in One Family.

From Undefiled Logical Intelligence Energy preexisting, Rationally, what unites Man and Caesar is the One Mind of God from the Faith of Abraham uniting genders hypo-statically and dynamically becoming transformed natures, logically becoming again for all Creation Transfigured in One United Family One God in being,

From the Faith of Abraham through Rationality for being able to see God with New Eyes, we become from logical again now in Two Natures from The Spirit through The Life Transfigured in One Family.

Peace always,
Stephen

1 Like
10

I thought that was Anarchy. I am a Libertarians and we do have many Anarchists in our movement. Read “Anatomy of the State” by Murray Rothbard for a better understanding of Anarchy from a Libertarian perspective.

Michael Malice also came out with a collection of writings on the subject, titled, “The Anarchist Handbook.”

Most people think of Communist Anarchy when they hear the term Anarchist, but libertarian anarchists and communist anarchists are not the same.

11

Anarchism, not anarchy.

Anyways, they definitely aren’t the same thing, you’ve got something right for once. “Communist” anarchists are more properly called libertarian socialists, actually. Turns out we were making use of the word before your… “movement.”

12

By “we” are you claiming to be a Communist? What do you love about Communism?

Not one of my An-Cap friends would identify as “Libertarian Socialist.” There are very few “Libertarian Socialists” in the liberty movement. Though one is free to associate with others and form communities, that is about as far socialist as they get.

Trent Horn co-authored a book titled, “Can a Catholic Be a Socialist?” if anyone is interested.

Here are some quotes I’ve jotted down from some books I’ve read over the years that relate to this topic:

“A communist is a socialist in a hurry. Socialism is a gradual process on many fronts…
It seems we did not recognize the enemy or appreciate his strategy. American socialism is not a religion or even a philosophy; it [has been sold as] a lifestyle [and we have become defenseless against it.] However, if the ‘spirit’ of freedom takes over a land, freedom itself will follow.” — Clarence Mason Weaver

Too many Americans have lost the spirit of liberty and have become complacent to a lifestyle of socialism, which communists are now exploiting.

“Some may believe that a Catholic can be virtually anything but a libertarian—well, I will tell you that if some sort of libertarian spirit does not take root in my country, it might not be too far off that the government says a Canadian can be anything but a Catholic.” — Kennedy Hall

“Socialism, like the ancient ideas from which it springs, confuses the distinction between government and society. As a result of this, every time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all. We disapprove of state education. Then the socialists say that we are opposed to any education. It is as if the socialists were to accuse us of not wanting persons to eat because we do not want the state to raise grain.” — Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

“Fascism (which is also very bad) is the stage reached after Communism has proved an illusion.” — Friedrich Hayek, The Road to Serfdom

13

Yeah, I usually identify as “anarchist adjacent.” But my politics are definitely Marxian.

I meant that we had the term “libertarian” before you did.

14

Gross!

Socialism & Communism always end in starvation and genocide. Always.

Did you know that not one, but two of Karl Marx’s daughters committed suicide?

And libertarians had the term “liberal” before Democrats hijacked it. It is what it is.

15

Right back at you, bud.

16

I think, if anything, that the current government we have needs to be dwindled down. Used to be that the government went by a “Checks and Balances” kind of system. But, as time went on, now there’s certain situations where, in certain situations, the president has all the power, and in other situations, Congress has the power. In other words, our own government, the people we supposidely vote in, are trying to do what is in their best interest and not that of the people.

Here in America, we’re supposed to be the government. If we don’t want something, then the leaders should act accordingly, but our republic is slowly being eroded away, which is why you have these terrible laws like “hate crimes.” I think we need to decrease the amount of people in our government, and we need to have term limits for everyone in the White House, cause some of those people who have been in there for years on end, really don’t do anything, or if they do it’s again in their best interest. All I know is, our government has become corrupt and it would not surprise me 30-40 years down the road if the First Amendment is gone completely, cause that seems to be the Amendment being targeted a lot as of late.

Personally, I say we completely revamp everything. Trash everything, start completely over, and build a new foundation and go up from there. The current government is corrupt and we need to do something about it before things really hit the fan.

17

What would you replace it with? That is the problem. Socialism and Communism is on the rise among young individuals, who’s brains have not fully developed and whom are being used as pawns for political gains. Then you have the boomers on the Right who vote and believe anything President Trump says about liberty-minded candidates who are outspoken about President Trump.

I think you would either need a National Divorce (dividing the Federal Government) or a Convention of States (giving States more governance and the Federal less governance, which at least would allow individuals to move to a different State if they do not like how they are being represented).

18

Well, what I would do is go back to the way things were supposed to work, with a few tweaks to it. And when I say go back, I’m saying go back even before 1776. In school, you’ve learned that in 1776 the Declaration of Independence was drafted, but that’s only a half-truth. Yes, in 1776, that version of the Declaration was indeed drafted, but that was not the original document. The original document was assembled earlier, but those who control the narrative in this country who are not only extremely influential but are filthy rich, decided to rewrite History. Their version is the 1776 document, not the earlier one. I don’t remember right off the bat when the actual Declaration was drafted, but it was not 1776, that much I remember.

But ok, let’s say most people agree that the 1776 Declaration was the original. Not a big deal, then what you would do is you would stick to the original as best as you could. You would bring back the “Checks and Balances” for everyone in government (including the president). The minor tweaks I would make would be term limits for everyone up there, and I would shrink the government. We literally don’t need all of those people up there. And then, of course, I’d try to bring back the original ideas and fundamentals of how our government was supposed to be: For the people!

The best way to go would be to have a Convention of the States. It’s going to be this country’s best bet to getting back on track, and to have all of our rights completely restored. We were originally a republic, not a democracy, and the Founding Fathers had it all figured out. The blueprint is there, it just needs to be fine-tuned.

1 Like
19

So what are your thoughts on all these agencies that the founding fathers never envisioned? A part of our representation or out of control entities that have little-to-no checks and balances? Anytime Congress tries to get information from one of these alphabet agencies they simply reply, “I cannot comment on an ongoing investigation.” Or they simply straight up lie. And if there are consequences, someone lower takes the fall. Or worse, individuals end up getting suicided. How do you stop an agency that is unstoppable? That follows their own rules, that are designed to protect the organization?

1 Like
20

Well…there’s definitely something going on, especially in these 3 letter agencies. If there’s anything in this country that one shouldn’t really trust, it would be most 3 letter agencies, cause I don’t think all of the people in these agencies are actually doing their job. In fact, I think it’s safe to say that most of these agencies are corrupt.

These bureaucracies, a lot of them need to be done away with. Because, unlike the government, bureaucracies are a major part of the problem. If the government wants to pass a law, there’s a procedure to do so, and it’s a pretty complicated procedure and it’s supposed to be that way. It’s supposed to be hard to pass a law, because the Founding Father’s knew that there was always a chance that bad laws would be passed (and as you can see, they were naturally right about that, cause there are some laws that were passed that really need to be re-examined). But when you have a bureaucracy, they don’t go through all of that. Basically, they get a bunch of experts to come together (Like experts that specialize in Food and Drugs, or the FDA), and bureaucracies are free to basically make any law without there being a process. Again, laws were made to be hard to pass on purpose, and since there’s no process to making laws when it comes to a bureaucracy, there is no vetting that occurs which is why you get these terrible laws to be passed. Just because you are an expert in something doesn’t mean you are fit to pass laws, and there are some really really BAD laws that are passed all the time!

So, here’s what I would propose. Get rid of a lot of these bureaucracies. Scrap them, most of them are silly to begin with, and again, a lot of these agencies are corrupt, and the last thing we need is corrupt people to pass laws for the average person. However, the flip side to this is, a lot of jobs would be eliminated.

So…if you wanted to keep these agencies from disappearing, then there needs to be checks and balances put on these agencies. Being able to freely make laws out of thin air needs to stop, because this again is one reason why we have bad laws. Or…better yet…have any law that a bureaucracy wants to pass to be put through the government and have them discuss that.

Honestly though, we would be so much better off if a lot of these agencies didn’t exist. Being able to pass a law out of nowhere makes bad laws. Get rid of the agencies and have laws only being passed through the government. That’s what I would do, personally.

2 Likes