(P1) Cardinal Bugnini was the primary architect or the Novus Ordo,
(P2) Him and 6 Protestants created the Novus Ordo,
(C) Therefore the Novus Ordo is intrinsicslly Protestant in nature.
It was created because the mass of Pius V was “too Catholic”.
The actual controversy that Jesus deals with has to do with the purpose of the Law of Moses. What is the intention of the Hebrew worship system, the Hebrew temple religion? What is the purpose of that teaching in the Old Testament? The Hebrews who opposed Jesus believed that the system of religion established by Moses in the Bible was to be maintained for all time, that it was the way of salvation. They believed salvation was only available to Hebrew people because only Hebrews followed the Law of Moses and worshiped God as commanded by the Law of Moses. Only Hebrews could be saved and have a relationship with God, but only if they entered into the Hebrew system of religion, starting with circumcision.
Circumcision was the law of the covenant of Abraham, and it was equivalent to what Christians would find in baptism. For a Hebrew living according to the Law of Moses, step one was circumcision. This became a problem if you were a Roman or a Greek.
Peace to all,
So true, nuncincipio, To me OMNILogically, “Too Catholic” is logically for all who understands the Two Nature God of Abraham becoming again in all One Family and is what the God of Abraham promises, eternal life in two natures, becoming Baptized in One Body in all becoming in all from Sacrifice through Penance, forgiven in all becoming again in One Divine Spirit Family One God in being, OMNILogically, I believe.
To me logically, the two natures, spirit and life becoming together in One Body is what is not rationally understood by so many. All mankind logically becomes in all in One Body through two natures from the spirit through the created souls of all for the flesh through The Christ uniting spirit and life in all becoming in One Body becoming again In all One Divine Spirit Family One God in being, in all generalizations logically, I believe.
The Hebrews were “picked” to carried the “Chosen” Living Sacrifice of Animals with them from Egypt to The Promiseland in the Ark of The Old Covenant, saving the spirits in the souls to the Bosom of Abraham awaiting the Christ in the good works of the flesh becoming in all One Body through both natures, God and Temple, Spirit and Life becoming again in all One Divine Spirit Family One God in being, in all rationality, I believe.
Catholics understand the Sacraments from death to life are Baptism and Penance through Sacrifice becoming again in all through both natures respectively, Spirit and Life, God and Temple, becoming in One Body through the Christ in all mankind becoming again in all One Divine Spirit Family One God in being, in all generalizations, I Believe.
Logically the God from the Faith of Abraham is The God of Two natures, Spirit and Life, God and Temple, becoming again in all One Divine Spirit Family One God in being, rationally and in all generalizations.
Old Covenant Salvation is Circumcision of the flesh through The “Chosen” Living Sacrifice of Animals and forgiven to save the one nature spirit in the Bosom of Abraham, New Covenant Salvation is Baptism from the spirit through the souls of all for the flesh in One Body in all from the fulfilled faith and morality in all through The Christ, The “Chosen” New Living Sacrifice in The Host through Penance becoming forgiven in both natures becoming again in all One Divine Spirit Family One God in being, to me, I believe.
Peace always,
Stephen
Sounds like an over-simplification. Do you have any evidence to back up your claims? I’m not saying that you are wrong, but it sounds a little presumptuous.
“ On 3 April 1969, Pope Paul VI published the apostolic constitution Missale Romanum, with which he brought radical changes to the way of celebrating the Mass. One of the architects of the liturgical reform was Monsignor Annibale Bugnini and six Protestant pastors also took part in it, including Max Thurian of the Taizé Community, who declared: One of the fruits of the new Ordo will perhaps be that non-Catholic communities will be able to celebrate the Holy Supper with the same prayers as the Catholic Church. Theologically it is possible.” Source:Breve esame critico del Novus Ordo Missae - Wikipedia
Yes sir, it is an “over simplification” of course. They wanted to be able to attract Protestants, so they ended up “Protestantising” the liturgy. And to help them, they got 6 Protestant “experts”. The only explanation for why they got 6 Protestants to help create the liturgy is that Paul VI et al. wanted to make the Mass more Protestant.